Forecast | Radar

Activate Account | Manage Account | Logout | Today's Paper
Today's Paper, also known as the e-Edition, is an online replica of the printed newspaper. You can view today's paper or previous issues.

Common Core State Standard
SL.CCS.1/2/3/4 Grades 6-12: An essay of a current news event is provided for discussion to encourage participation, but also inspire the use of evidence to support logical claims using the main ideas of the article. Students must analyze background information provided about a current event within the news, draw out the main ideas and key details, and review different opinions on the issue. Then, students should present their own claims using facts and analysis for support.


Publishers struggle to control online reader comments

See if this topic hits home with students by asking for a show of hands from those who've commented on articles or news topics at this publication's web site or any other. Has anyone seen personal attacks or offensive comments? Are reader forums worthwhile?
Ask students to scroll through this paper's forums on sensitive issues -- the Iraq war, political candidates, President Bush -- and find examples of respectful disagreements, as well as any juvenile name-calling. Have them read a few comments aloud for a discussion about whether they're effective and persuasive.
"Join the conversation," as newspapers say. If class members already are registered to post comments, or want to do so, suggest that they select a topic of interest -- perhaps related to education, sports or pop culture -- and post a brief comment or vote in a survey. As a possible follow-up, revisit the site after a day to see what others posted.

Giving readers more ways to comment on issues in the news seems like a good idea, so many newspapers and magazines encourage online visitors to share views in discussion forums, reader polls or at the end of articles, commentaries and blog postings. But as in other crowded arenas, especially settings where participants are anonymous and faceless, crude voices can outnumber or drive away civil ones.

Vicious rants, personal insults and even death threats have embarrassed several major media outlets recently and make editors rethink their invitations to “tell us what you think.” The Washington Post blocked all comments to an article this year that drew a flood of racist comments. The nastiness highlights challenges that sprout up when print publications use new media technology to create an old-style “town square” where people exchange ideas, debate issues and have conversations that editors hope are enlightening, uplifting, entertaining, amusing and civil.

That’s tough to achieve in real life. And when participants hide behind screen names, a dialogue can skid into the gutter easily. The biggest problem is the vast volume of comments. No company can afford monitors and moderators who prescreen postings. Software filters block specific profanity, though not necessarily curses that omit a few letters. ABC News has a program that lets site administrators spot the word “hate” near descriptions of an ethnic or religious group.
The most common remedy is free: Ask readers to flag abusive comments for removal. USA Today also keeps a public index of previous comments by screen names, which editors hope will keep the tone civil.

Editor says: "The sheer volume of the comments makes it impossible to monitor every one in real time. And there is an expectation on the part of the audience for a kind of immediacy. We are not intervening with a heavy hand." – Kinsey Wilson, USA Today executive editor

Professor says: "To approve every comment before it goes up tends to syncopate the conversation so much that you might as well not have the conversation." -- Jeff Jarvis, director of interactive journalism, City University of New York

Can papers be sued over public comments? No. The Communication Decency Act, enacted in 1996, shields web forum owners from liability for posted comments. "Congress has said that the soapbox should not be held liable for what the speaker has said," says an attorney at the nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Front Page Talking Points is written by Felix Grabowski and Alan Stamm for NIEonline.com, Copyright 2016
We welcome comments or suggestions for future topics: Click here to Comment

Front Page Talking Points Archive

Undrinkable water in Flint, Mich., is a signal of health risks from old lead pipes in other cities

Super Bowl 50: A veteran quarterback (Peyton Manning) and a young star (Cam Newton) face off Sunday

All-white acting nominees for movie Oscars revive a national discussion

The actor and the fugitive: Sean Penn's Rolling Stone interview with 'El Chapo' has critics

Annual tech event showcases amazing, useful and wacky electronic devices

The year ahead: Here’s some of what will make front page news during 2016

Protecting the planet: Nations pledge to cut fossil fuels and expand use of cleaner energy

New era for U.S. military: Gender no longer blocks women from infantry or other combat roles

New way to roll: Motorized balance boards are glitzy, costly and a target of concerns

Scary times: More than 30 governors resist federal plans to bring Syrian war refugees

Complete archive