Subscribe to the Albuquerque Journal NIE
Already have an NIE subscription?


For Grades 5-8 , week of Sep. 14, 2026

1. ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON HAS BEEN UNUSUALLY QUIET

The Atlantic hurricane season has reached its usual busiest period without producing a single hurricane, something that has not happened this late in the season since 1941. Five tropical storms have formed, but none has become strong enough to reach hurricane status. One major reason is El Niño, a weather pattern that has created strong wind shear over the Atlantic and Caribbean. Wind shear means that winds change speed or direction at different heights, which can tear developing storms apart before they grow stronger. Dry air and dust from the Sahara have also made hurricane formation more difficult. However, meteorologists warn that people should not assume the danger is over. Warm ocean water could provide energy for storms later in the season, and during El Niño years some hurricanes can develop quickly near the U.S. coast, leaving communities with less time to prepare. Summarize the story, including details like conditions that have prevented hurricanes, conditions that could still help hurricanes form, and reasons coastal communities should remain prepared. Use at least four scientific terms from the story, such as El Niño, wind shear, warm ocean water, or dry air. Add a simple diagram showing how wind shear can disrupt a developing storm.

2. TRUMP’S COMMENTS REVIVE THE DEBATE OVER A UNITED IRELAND

President Donald Trump said during a visit to Ireland that he supports the idea of combining Northern Ireland with the Republic of Ireland, bringing new attention to a political question that has divided the island for more than a century. Northern Ireland remained part of the United Kingdom when most of Ireland became independent. For decades, nationalists who generally wanted closer ties with Ireland and unionists who wanted to remain part of the United Kingdom were divided by political and religious differences. Violence known as “The Troubles” killed about 3,600 people before the 1998 Good Friday Agreement helped bring lasting peace. That agreement allows people in Northern Ireland to identify as British, Irish, or both and creates a process for a future vote on unification if enough public support exists. Some Irish nationalists welcomed Trump’s comments, while unionist politicians argued that Northern Ireland’s future should be decided by its own people. British and Irish leaders also emphasized the importance of following the Good Friday Agreement rather than treating unification as a simple merger. Make a past-present-future chart about Northern Ireland. In the “Past” section, explain why Northern Ireland became politically divided and what happened during the Troubles. In the “Present” section, describe how the Good Friday Agreement handles questions of identity and government. In the “Future” section, explain what would have to happen before Irish unification could occur. Finish with two sentences explaining why outside political leaders must be careful when speaking about conflicts connected to identity and past violence.

3. MAJOR A.I. LEADERS CALL FOR SLOWER DEVELOPMENT

Several leaders of major artificial-intelligence companies are calling for A.I. development to slow down so safety protections have more time to catch up. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei argued that increasingly powerful systems could become difficult for people to understand or control if companies continue racing ahead too quickly. Leaders including Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and Demis Hassabis also expressed support for stronger safety measures or a slower pace. Proposed ideas include allowing independent experts to inspect advanced A.I. systems, setting shared safety standards, and increasing cooperation between governments. Supporters of a slowdown worry about problems such as cybersecurity attacks and future systems improving themselves without enough human oversight. Critics, however, argue that large A.I. companies could benefit from strict regulations because smaller competitors might have more difficulty meeting expensive requirements. The debate shows that A.I. safety is not simply about whether technology is good or bad, but about how quickly it should advance and who should be responsible for checking the risks. Write your own news article that summarizes the recent statements from A.I. executives and why this is an unusual or surprising move for industry leaders. Include at least three pieces of evidence from the story that explains why these A.I. experts feel more regulation is needed and that A.I. development should be slowed.

4. A.I. MAKES A GEORGIA BALLOT-PRIVACY PROBLEM EASIER TO EXPLOIT

Election-security researchers are warning about a flaw in Georgia’s voting system that could make it possible to connect some voters with their supposedly secret ballots. Georgia voters use touchscreen machines that print paper ballots, which are then scanned and counted. Researchers found that certain electronic records can potentially be placed back into the order in which ballots were cast. When those records are combined with other publicly available information, powerful A.I. tools can make the process of matching voters to ballots much easier. The problem does not allow someone to change votes or mean that election totals are incorrect, but it raises serious concerns about ballot privacy. Georgia officials are limiting access to some records and working to scramble certain data, while critics argue that the technology itself should be changed so ballots cannot be traced in the first place. The disagreement involves two important values: keeping election records transparent for the public while also protecting every voter’s right to cast a secret ballot. Imagine you are advising an election board that must protect both transparency and privacy. Write a memo with three sections: “the problem,” “possible fixes,” and “best temporary solution.” Explain why secret ballots matter, describe two solutions discussed in the story, and identify one drawback of each. End by explaining how election officials could make records available for public oversight without revealing how individual people voted.

5. TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ACTIONS SPARK DEBATE OVER PRESS FREEDOM

President Trump and his administration have taken a wide range of actions involving journalists and media organizations, creating a major debate about the meaning of press freedom. Federal agencies have issued subpoenas to reporters, restricted some journalists’ access, investigated media organizations, and used regulatory powers involving television networks. Trump has also filed personal lawsuits against news organizations and critics whose coverage he disputes. The administration argues that these actions are meant to challenge inaccurate or biased reporting and hold media companies accountable. Free-speech organizations and some judges, however, have warned that government investigations, legal costs, or threats involving licenses and access can cause journalists or companies to avoid certain stories even before a court decides whether their speech is legally protected. Courts have blocked or questioned some government actions, showing how the judicial branch can become involved when First Amendment rights are disputed. Similar conflicts between presidents and the press have occurred throughout U.S. history, but current critics argue that the number and variety of government tools being used make the present dispute especially important. Recent reporting has also documented increased concern among press-freedom organizations about government subpoenas and regulatory pressure involving journalists. Create a First Amendment case file using three actions from the story. For each example, identify what the government or president did, the reason supporters gave for the action, and the concern raised by journalists or free-speech advocates. Then label each example “clearly government action,” “personal legal action,” or “both.” Finish with a short explanation of the term chilling effect: describe how a journalist might change behavior because of a threat or investigation even if no court has ruled that the reporting was illegal.