![]()
Common Core State Standard
SL.CCS.1/2/3/4 Grades 6-12: An essay of a current news event is provided for discussion to encourage participation, but also inspire the use of evidence to support logical claims using the main ideas of the article. Students must analyze background information provided about a current event within the news, draw out the main ideas and key details, and review different opinions on the issue. Then, students should present their own claims using facts and analysis for support. FOR THE WEEK OF SEP. 15, 2025 National Guard anti-crime mission in cities blurs the line between police and military![]() ![]() Why do you agree, or not, with a backer or critic of a White House policy?
![]() Summarize other government coverage.
![]() React to a crime story from your city or state.
President Trump is testing a 147-year-old law that says the military can't typically engage in standard police work. He federalized the District of Columbia police department this summer and sent National Guard members to the capital, as well as to Los Angeles in June. (A 30-day takeover of D.C. policing ended last week, though the Army will keep guard units there until Nov. 30. City leaders challenge the action in court.) The president also spoke last week of sending federalized National Guard troops to Memphis, Tenn., where Mayor Lee Harris isn't welcoming. "To have individuals with military fatigues, semiautomatic weapons and armored vehicles patrolling our streets is way too far, anti-democratic and anti-American," he said. Earlier, Trump listed Chicago, Boston, Baltimore, New York, New Orleans, New York City and Portland, Ore., as potential sites for a military crime-fighting presence. Separately, hundreds of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents surged into Boston and Chicago last week. State and local officials weren't notified in advance, they say. Critics say the deployments are intended to punish Democratic-led cities and spread fear in immigrant communities. "There is no emergency that warrants deployment of troops," said Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker in response to that possible move. While "crime emergency" responses in the capital are allowed under its special status as a federal district, sending soldiers to a state without the governor's request would likely spark a legal battle like one in Los Angeles this summer. A district judge there ruled this month that the administration broke federal law by using thousands of National Guard members and a smaller number of Marines in response to protests over immigration raids. Professor Luke William Hunt of the University if Alabama, a policing scholar and former FBI special agent, posts in a recent commentary: "The plan to continue using National Guard troops to reduce crime in cities such as Chicago and Baltimore violates the legal prohibition against domestic military law enforcement." Others experts say presidents deserve near-total legal leeway for military use, even under the Posse Comitatus Act signed in 1878 by President Rutherford B. Hayes. Andrew Stoltman, a Chicago attorney and law professor at Northwestern University, expects the Supreme Court to eventually allow Trump's unconventional use of the National Guard. The court has sided with him in temporary rulings this year.
Front Page Talking Points is written by
Alan Stamm for NIEonline.com, Copyright 2025
Front Page Talking Points Archive►National Guard anti-crime mission in cities blurs the line between police and military ►Warning sign: Bleaching of colorful ocean coral worsens off Australia, adding to concern ►Conflicts arise as U.S. politics gets enmeshed with science ►Billion-dollar cut in federal support for public TV and radio imperils stations nationwide ►EPA wants to drop finding that lets it limit planet-warming pollution ►Government defends masks hiding immigration agents' faces, which raise 'secret police' concerns ►Measles moves from medical history to a renewed concern as U.S. vaccination rate drops |